This question came into my mailbox. The writer said he asked his HR Director what was the difference between the two and she said she didn’t know. She gave him the right answer. HR Directors are usually not Financial Advisors and typically are not licensed (and therefore shouldn’t) offer investment or financial advice. They know retirement
- Also Read: Early Retirement for Federal Employees: The Must-Do List Before You Hand In That Notice
- Also Read: What Does the Federal Retirement Process Look Like?
- Also Read: Basics of Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS): You Should Know These
The difference between a broker and a registered investment advisor (RIA) has a lot to do with how that professional’s business is structured. This might sound a little unkind, but it is what I believe constitutes the most significant difference between the two. The broker is generally a representative who works for a brokerage firm selling securities. Brokers are not really financial advisors (regardless of the name they might call themselves), but are selling a product. The selling of products generally carries a commission, sort of like in the movie – The Wolf of Wall Street. The brokers, not to say they are not good people, but they truly have a motive to sell a product. The question becomes – Does their interest come before yours?   Just a question to think about.
A Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) is required by law to not only give you suitable advice or recommendations, but must act with a tremendous amount of fiduciary responsibility. Both are regulated by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but to different degrees or operating parameters. RIAs are required to put the client’s interest first and not their own.  In short – if you have a choice, a RIA may be your better option.
The most important requirement is making sure you are educated about what direction you want to take when it comes to financial planning and managing and transferring your wealth.
P. S. Always Remember to Share What You Know.