Tuesday night was a busy night for the negotiating parties, which stayed up after their bedtime to announce a deal. There were heated complaints about some errors in the legislation. Finally, officers considered the issues, and Wednesday night, the Senate passed its economic stimulus-relief bill and sent it to the House. Now the Senator has released a $2 trillion financial relief bill. To get complete information about Retirement-related provisions in the Senate Coronavirus Stimulus and Relief Bill, go through this guide. I hope you will find it useful.
- Also Read: 3 Reasons Certain Federal Employees Can Retire Years Earlier Than Their Peers Without Penalties
- Also Read: CSRS Retirement in 2024: Are You Making the Most of What This Classic Plan Has to Offer?
- Also Read: Roth IRA Basics for Beginners: What’s There to Learn?
My primary concern was the retirement-related provision, so we are discussing the same in more detail here.
Provision for savers under section 2202
Individuals who are clobbered by the coronavirus pandemic will be allowed to withdraw from their retirement accounts (IRAs, 401(k) s, etc.) amount of up to $100,000 (no early withdrawal penalty on this withdrawal). This is not the only relief, but the money withdrawn will be re-contributed to a retirement account within three years (The usual annual contribution caps removed). If an individual cannot repay, the amount withdrawn will be taxed as per ordinary income tax rates over three years. You need to thoroughly check the definition of eligibility for withdrawing money early penalty-free. We must say that its interpretation is expansive but helpful for anyone experiencing economic loss due to the coronavirus.
The loan limit from retirement plans has been increased from $50,000 to $100,000. The already existing clause that limits loans to exceed half the vested account balance has been revoked. Due dates to pay new loans or already outstanding loans have been extended by one year.
Most of this legislation resembles prior mitigations of “disaster relief,” funds for individuals affected by the three hurricanes of Harvey, Irma, and Maria that clobber the county in 2017.
Provision for retirees under section 2203
The legislation has removed the required minimum distributions (RMD) for IRAs and other individual retirement accounts for this year.
For pension plans under sections 3607 and 3608
Earlier this week, I read an article focusing on issues of pension plan sponsors. They talked about government action, and individual facing challenges with the quarterly pension plan contributions that were due as on 15th April, when they are hard-hit by a coronavirus and facing major cash flow problems and could hardly direct money to pensions. This legislation gives some relief to that concern by extending those contributions to 1st January 2021, with interest. Not only this, but the critical component of already existing legislation rules is also that pension plans with a funded status less than 80% will not be able to pay money in lump sums to their participants. To prevent a low funded status calculation, plans should consider the last measurement before 2020 instead of 2020 analysis. Last but not least, the Department of Labor had the power to postpone various deadlines for ERISA for terrorism or war cases. The law gives them the same power due to a “public health emergency.” This change may not have an immediate effect. Still, it will help the Department of Labor to include this ERISA clause to give extensions, as they did at the time of 2017 hurricanes and California wildfires.
Things not covered by the bill
The House version of relief and stimulus bill was not appreciated for its grab-bag of provisions and supporting items on a wish list that were not linked to the coronavirus economic crisis at hand. Things that were criticized included the “Butch Lewis Act” — that is, the “Rehabilitation for Multiemployer Pensions,” House-passed legislation guaranteed to fix the multiemployer crisis using 30-year loans wherein the interest is paid for the first 29 years. The final principal payment in the year 30th is forgivable if the plan can’t pay.
The House version of the bill also supporting funding relief for community newspapers.
It is good that these provisions were not included.
The House bill also included pension plans sponsored by the employer to help them in the crisis. This will help them cover up losses after the market crash, bear the weak economy over fifteen rather than seven years, and grow in the expected very-low discount rates. Otherwise, these companies would be obliged to calculate their liabilities. 95% of pension plans have a “plan year” similar to the calendar year, so that an individual has time for these plans, both in terms of future rules and regulations and their ability to foresee their financial stability as soon as 1st April.
Pension-related special treatment items included
One benefit that I can tell with 100% surety is the benefit for the March of Dimes. This comes under Section 3609. Cooperative and Small Employer Charity Pension Plan Rule will apply only to Certain Charitable Employers Whose Primary purposes of Exemption are to provide Services to Mothers and Children.
Like 2014, various small charities and similar employers were given the freedom to take exemptions from the current pension plan and were allowed to fund their pensions less stringently. The March of Dimes, however, doesn’t qualify “cooperative or small employer charity pension plan,” but, in November, a group of legislators came up with a bill that included new narrowly defined criteria what March of Dimes is. The definition comes from a year ago describing fundraising shortfalls, the proliferation of competitor “fundraising walks,” and efforts to “rebrand and refocus.”
Do you think this was relevant legislation that could not pass on its own? Honestly saying, I am not happy with this, but in the grand list of provisions, this one is just small potatoes.
What will happen to the payroll tax credit?
Every time we start talking about the proposals to tax relief as payroll tax credits/cuts, people start worrying about the damage to their Social Security benefits. If transfers from general federal funds don’t drive the Trust Fund, then the funding of Social Security is expected to suffer. And if these funds are reduced, the Social Security funding is impacted and set separate from other government operations. At this stage, the advocacy group Social Security work takes charge.
“The Republican plan will replace the dedicated revenue of Social Security with deficit-funded general revenue, but this is just a trap. Once this ongoing pandemic is done, Republicans will start using their general revenue to raise demand for cuts to Social Security under ‘reining in entitlements.’”
The reality is that offering benefits via “payroll tax credits” is not a well-planned or criminal act to weaken the benefits of social security. Logically, it is one of the natural things to do at any rate. It is comparatively more natural than other mechanisms readily available in the market.
What next?
There are so many unknown speculations that are spreading across the globe. Will this coronavirus pandemic and its market slowdown turn out to be a nasty recession period? Will its effects be different from a “normal” recession and cause an economic textbook to rewrite chapters? And how these things will impact the retirement world?
